Datum
2014-03-01Autor
Schrott, AngelaSchlagwort
440 Französisch, romanische Sprachen allgemein Kontrastive PragmatikPhraseologieMündlichkeitDiskurstheorieInterkulturelles VerstehenMetadata
Zur Langanzeige
Aufsatz
Sprachwissenschaft als Kulturwissenschaft aus romanistischer Sicht: Das Beispiel der kontrastiven Pragmatik
Zusammenfassung
One of the central questions of pragmalinguistics is the distinction between linguistic structures and cultural norms that guide the usage of these structures in verbal interaction. is distinction is especially important for contrastive pragmatics, which analyses the interfaces of different languages and cultures. In order to draw a clear line between linguistic and cultural differences in patterns of interaction, contrastive pragmatics needs a methodological framework that is centred around a precise analytical separation between the idiomatic traditions of language and the cultural traditions of verbal interaction. Based on Eugenio Coseriu's system of language as a cultural competence, the study introduces a model that distinguishes three perspectives and types of (contrastive) pragmatics. A keynotion of this model is the concept of discourse traditions as a cultural knowledge that guides verbal interactions. Using this model as a blueprint, the study discusses discourse traditions of requesting with a focus on question acts used as polite requests. In the study, the idea of cultural traditions of discourse, which has been widely discussed in Romance linguistics during the last years, proves to be fruitful for a new methodological perspective on illocutionary patterns and communicative routines in contrastive and intercultural pragmatics.
Zitierform
In: Romanische Forschungen Volume 126 / Number 1 (2014-03-01) , S. 3-44(42) ; issn:0035-8126Zitieren
@article{doi:10.17170/kobra-202103083444,
author={Schrott, Angela},
title={Sprachwissenschaft als Kulturwissenschaft aus romanistischer Sicht: Das Beispiel der kontrastiven Pragmatik},
journal={Romanische Forschungen},
year={2014}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2014$n2014 1500 1/ger 2050 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/12863 3000 Schrott, Angela 4000 Sprachwissenschaft als Kulturwissenschaft aus romanistischer Sicht: Das Beispiel der kontrastiven Pragmatik / Schrott, Angela 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/12863=x R 4204 \$dAufsatz 4170 5550 {{Kontrastive Pragmatik}} 5550 {{Phraseologie}} 5550 {{Mündlichkeit}} 5550 {{Diskurstheorie}} 5550 {{Interkulturelles Verstehen}} 7136 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/12863
2021-05-28T10:17:11Z 2021-05-28T10:17:11Z 2014-03-01 doi:10.17170/kobra-202103083444 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/12863 ger Urheberrechtlich geschützt https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/ 440 Sprachwissenschaft als Kulturwissenschaft aus romanistischer Sicht: Das Beispiel der kontrastiven Pragmatik Aufsatz One of the central questions of pragmalinguistics is the distinction between linguistic structures and cultural norms that guide the usage of these structures in verbal interaction. is distinction is especially important for contrastive pragmatics, which analyses the interfaces of different languages and cultures. In order to draw a clear line between linguistic and cultural differences in patterns of interaction, contrastive pragmatics needs a methodological framework that is centred around a precise analytical separation between the idiomatic traditions of language and the cultural traditions of verbal interaction. Based on Eugenio Coseriu's system of language as a cultural competence, the study introduces a model that distinguishes three perspectives and types of (contrastive) pragmatics. A keynotion of this model is the concept of discourse traditions as a cultural knowledge that guides verbal interactions. Using this model as a blueprint, the study discusses discourse traditions of requesting with a focus on question acts used as polite requests. In the study, the idea of cultural traditions of discourse, which has been widely discussed in Romance linguistics during the last years, proves to be fruitful for a new methodological perspective on illocutionary patterns and communicative routines in contrastive and intercultural pragmatics. open access Schrott, Angela doi:10.3196/003581214810860517 Kontrastive Pragmatik Phraseologie Mündlichkeit Diskurstheorie Interkulturelles Verstehen acceptedVersion issn:0035-8126 eissn:1864-0737 Number 1 Romanische Forschungen 3-44(42) Volume 126 false
Die folgenden Lizenzbestimmungen sind mit dieser Ressource verbunden:
:Urheberrechtlich geschützt