How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-24T14:33:33Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-07-24T14:33:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-05-12 | |
| dc.identifier | doi:10.17170/kobra-202307248468 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/14920 | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Gefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEAL | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.rights | Namensnennung 4.0 International | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | Management | eng |
| dc.subject | Methodology | eng |
| dc.subject | Replicability | eng |
| dc.subject | Research process | eng |
| dc.subject | Structured literature review | eng |
| dc.subject | Systematic literature review | eng |
| dc.subject.ddc | 330 | |
| dc.title | How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions | eng |
| dc.type | Aufsatz | |
| dcterms.abstract | Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) have become a standard tool in many fields of management research but are often considerably less stringently presented than other pieces of research. The resulting lack of replicability of the research and conclusions has spurred a vital debate on the SLR process, but related guidance is scattered across a number of core references and is overly centered on the design and conduct of the SLR, while failing to guide researchers in crafting and presenting their findings in an impactful way. This paper offers an integrative review of the widely applied and most recent SLR guidelines in the management domain. The paper adopts a well-established six-step SLR process and refines it by sub-dividing the steps into 14 distinct decisions: (1) from the research question, via (2) characteristics of the primary studies, (3) to retrieving a sample of relevant literature, which is then (4) selected and (5) synthesized so that, finally (6), the results can be reported. Guided by these steps and decisions, prior SLR guidelines are critically reviewed, gaps are identified, and a synthesis is offered. This synthesis elaborates mainly on the gaps while pointing the reader toward the available guidelines. The paper thereby avoids reproducing existing guidance but critically enriches it. The 6 steps and 14 decisions provide methodological, theoretical, and practical guidelines along the SLR process, exemplifying them via best-practice examples and revealing their temporal sequence and main interrelations. The paper guides researchers in the process of designing, executing, and publishing a theory-based and impact-oriented SLR. | eng |
| dcterms.accessRights | open access | |
| dcterms.creator | Sauer, Philipp Christopher | |
| dcterms.creator | Seuring, Stefan | |
| dcterms.extent | 1899-1933 | |
| dc.relation.doi | doi:10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3 | |
| dc.subject.jel | M10 | |
| dc.subject.jel | M20 | |
| dc.subject.swd | Management | ger |
| dc.subject.swd | Methodologie | ger |
| dc.subject.swd | Forschungsprozess | ger |
| dc.subject.swd | Literaturrecherche | ger |
| dc.type.version | publishedVersion | |
| dcterms.source.identifier | eissn:1863-6691 | |
| dcterms.source.issue | issue 6 | |
| dcterms.source.journal | Review of Managerial Science | eng |
| dcterms.source.volume | Volume 17 | |
| kup.iskup | false |
Dateien zu dieser Ressource
Das Dokument erscheint in:
-
Artikel [1109]
Solange nicht anders angezeigt, wird die Lizenz wie folgt beschrieben: Namensnennung 4.0 International