Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2024-01-26T11:52:12Z
dc.date.available2024-01-26T11:52:12Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-29
dc.identifierdoi:10.17170/kobra-202401269441
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15400
dc.description.sponsorshipGefördert im Rahmen des Projekts DEAL
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsNamensnennung 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectbee swarm optimizationeng
dc.subjectmetaheuristicseng
dc.subjectstructural equation modelingeng
dc.subjectdimensionalityeng
dc.subjectmodel specification searcheng
dc.subject.ddc150
dc.subject.ddc370
dc.titleModel Specification Searches in Structural Equation Modeling Using Bee Swarm Optimizationeng
dc.typeAufsatz
dcterms.abstractMetaheuristics are optimization algorithms that efficiently solve a variety of complex combinatorial problems. In psychological research, metaheuristics have been applied in short-scale construction and model specification search. In the present study, we propose a bee swarm optimization (BSO) algorithm to explore the structure underlying a psychological measurement instrument. The algorithm assigns items to an unknown number of nested factors in a confirmatory bifactor model, while simultaneously selecting items for the final scale. To achieve this, the algorithm follows the biological template of bees’ foraging behavior: Scout bees explore new food sources, whereas onlooker bees search in the vicinity of previously explored, promising food sources. Analogously, scout bees in BSO introduce major changes to a model specification (e.g., adding or removing a specific factor), whereas onlooker bees only make minor changes (e.g., adding an item to a factor or swapping items between specific factors). Through this division of labor in an artificial bee colony, the algorithm aims to strike a balance between two opposing strategies diversification (or exploration) versus intensification (or exploitation). We demonstrate the usefulness of the algorithm to find the underlying structure in two empirical data sets (Holzinger–Swineford and short dark triad questionnaire, SDQ3). Furthermore, we illustrate the influence of relevant hyperparameters such as the number of bees in the hive, the percentage of scouts to onlookers, and the number of top solutions to be followed. Finally, useful applications of the new algorithm are discussed, as well as limitations and possible future research opportunities.eng
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
dcterms.creatorSchroeders, Ulrich
dcterms.creatorScharf, Florian
dcterms.creatorOlaru, Gabriel
dc.relation.doidoi:10.1177/00131644231160552
dc.subject.swdMetaheuristikger
dc.subject.swdStrukturgleichungsmodellger
dc.subject.swdSchwarmintelligenzger
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dcterms.source.identifiereissn:1552-3888
dcterms.source.issueIssue 1
dcterms.source.journalEducational and Psychological Measurement (EPM)eng
dcterms.source.pageinfo40-61
dcterms.source.volumeVolume 84
kup.iskupfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Namensnennung 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Namensnennung 4.0 International