Working paper
Theorising Postdevelopment
Abstract
The paper seeks to define and situate postdevelopment (PD) theory within the social sciences by discussing its relation to other theoretical approaches. It concludes that PD can be seen to a rather limited extent as a development theory, but rather as a sociology of knowledge of this discipline and a critiqu e of its foundation. PD shares the critique of capitalism with Marxism but also has a more negative view of industrial modernity, its relation to nature, economic growth and productivity. For some, PD is characterized by a spirituality alien to western mod ernity, although this does not seem to be necessary to subscribe to the approach. Although PD’s critique is intimately related to ecofeminist thinking (and ecofeminist authors), many of its male protagonists seem unaware of this proximity. PD is clearly a postcolonial (or decolonial) critique of colonial and neocolonial relations of power which can be found also in knowledge production, in particular in the division between the ‘developed’ Self (Europe and European settler colonies and other societies emula ting them) and the ‘backward’ Other. And PD, at the least skeptical PD, is based on a post post-anarchist perspective of ontological equality, oriented towards self self-determination in the pluriverse and rearguard theories.
Citation
@unpublished{doi:10.17170/kobra-202311309122,
author={Ziai, Aram},
title={Theorising Postdevelopment},
year={2023}
}
0500 Oax 0501 Text $btxt$2rdacontent 0502 Computermedien $bc$2rdacarrier 1100 2023$n2023 1500 1/eng 2050 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15246 3000 Ziai, Aram 4000 Theorising Postdevelopment / Ziai, Aram 4030 4060 Online-Ressource 4085 ##0##=u http://nbn-resolving.de/http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15246=x R 4204 \$dWorking paper 4170 5550 {{Post-Development}} 5550 {{Marxismus}} 5550 {{Anarchismus}} 5550 {{Spiritualismus}} 7136 ##0##http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15246
2023-12-01T08:25:00Z 2023-12-01T08:25:00Z 2023-11 doi:10.17170/kobra-202311309122 http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/15246 eng Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Post-development Post-Colonialism Marxism Spiritualism Anarchism 300 Theorising Postdevelopment Working paper The paper seeks to define and situate postdevelopment (PD) theory within the social sciences by discussing its relation to other theoretical approaches. It concludes that PD can be seen to a rather limited extent as a development theory, but rather as a sociology of knowledge of this discipline and a critiqu e of its foundation. PD shares the critique of capitalism with Marxism but also has a more negative view of industrial modernity, its relation to nature, economic growth and productivity. For some, PD is characterized by a spirituality alien to western mod ernity, although this does not seem to be necessary to subscribe to the approach. Although PD’s critique is intimately related to ecofeminist thinking (and ecofeminist authors), many of its male protagonists seem unaware of this proximity. PD is clearly a postcolonial (or decolonial) critique of colonial and neocolonial relations of power which can be found also in knowledge production, in particular in the division between the ‘developed’ Self (Europe and European settler colonies and other societies emula ting them) and the ‘backward’ Other. And PD, at the least skeptical PD, is based on a post post-anarchist perspective of ontological equality, oriented towards self self-determination in the pluriverse and rearguard theories. open access Ziai, Aram iii, 26 Seiten Kassel, Universität Kassel, Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften Post-Development Marxismus Anarchismus Spiritualismus publishedVersion DPS Working Paper Series No. 16/2023 false
The following license files are associated with this item: